Welcome to Magazine Premium

You can change this text in the options panel in the admin

There are tons of ways to configure Magazine Premium... The possibilities are endless!

Member Login
Lost your password?

What about 2 Peter 3?

March 22, 2016

When those of us who have become certain that Paul is a false apostle/prophet and liar present the evidence to Christians one of the arguments they make against us is that Peter supports Paul in 2 Peter 3.  It did not take long to analyze this passage to realize that it was in fact fraudulent and it can be proven by a simple analysis. So lets look at what 2 Peter says in regards to Paul. 2 Peter 3:15-17:

 15 and consider that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation—as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, 16 as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.

17 You therefore, beloved, since you know this beforehand, beware lest you also fall from your own steadfastness, being led away with the error of the wicked. 

Before we put forth the evidence showing that this passage is fraudulent and later added by a scribe who was in support of Paul lets look at what God has said in regards to his word being placed alongside lies. Jeremiah 8:8: How can you say, ‘We are wise, And the law of the Lord is with us’?
Look, the false pen of the scribe certainly works falsehood. 

Okay so here we have evidence that what we call God’s Words could and has in fact contained falsehood.

Now notice how the verse in 2 Peter refers to Paul’s letters as scripture.  People fail to realize that Paul was writing letters to the various churches he was trying to proselytize to his new religion of Christianity.  For Peter to refer to Paul’s letters as scripture is like me referring to Billy Graham’s letters as scripture and saying that every letter he wrote was the word of God. The fact is Paul himself even admits at times that what he is writing is not from God but his own advice.  Now lets look at the fact that the verse in 2 Peter refers to Paul’s letters as hard to understand. If this is true this verse itself contradicts what Paul himself has wrote in 1 Corinthians 14:33: For God is not the author of confusion. Okay so Paul writes that God is not the author of confusion but this verse in 2 Peter seems to indicate that his words, which he is calling scripture, is confusing and hard to understand.

Now lets look at the fact that the verses indicates that if we twist his verse we will be lead away with the error of the wicked. If you look up the meaning of the word used for wicked here it is describing someone as lawless. Isn’t that exactly what Paul is doing, teaching that we don’t have to abide by and are not under God’s Law. Therefore how could the improper use of his letters lead us into being lawless when the letters themselves if read without twisting completely support lawlessness.

Its also interesting to note that whoever wrote this passage referred to Paul as a brother and not the apostle that he claimed he was.  It seems likely that people were not buying what Paul had to say in his letters and therefore a scribe years later decided to try to support Paul with this fraudulent verse. Where else in the entire Bible is someone delivering God’s word brought into question so much that a verse has to be added to support them. Its obvious the fact that Paul’s letter contained contradictions and people were seeing it is the reason that someone later added this verse to try to keep them from rejecting Paul as so many of us that are waking up have done.

Finally, Yeshua himself gave Peter a very interesting warning after his resurrection. Read what Yeshua told Peter. John 21:18: Yeshua tells Peter, “Truly, truly, I say to you, when you were younger, you used to gird yourself and walk wherever you wished; but when you grow old, you will stretch out your hands and someone else will gird you, and bring you where you do not wish to go.” Every time that these verses in 2 Peter are read, Peter (his testimony) is taken where he does not want to go. I do not believe Peter would ever want to support Paul or anyone like Paul who abrogated the perfect Law of Yahweh.  Because the evidence against Paul is so complete in showing that he is a false apostle it is obvious these verses in 2 Peter are fraudulent if not all of 2 Peter itself. false

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *